This is amusing to me, because to me this is a contest to decide the better of two evils. I understand that many here are in the "believers" class, but I'm not. I'm an atheist, and to me the entire issue sets off on the wrong foot:
First, with the assumption that there exists a "spirit realm" containing creatures both friendly and unfriendly to man. Maybe I should also add creatures who are indifferent to man's plight.
Second, that there *might* be elements of Watchtower dogma and expectations that are TRUTH.
It is like having an imaginary barrel that contains imaginary rotten, maggot-ridden fish and thinking, "Some of that fish might be tasty."
Rutherford was, MAYBE, an intelligent man whose major concern was HIMSELF, even to the exclusion of his wife and their son.
Franz was a religious fanatic who believed that he was "blessed" with special "spiritual" insight.
History has shown both of these fools to be LIARS.
Which LIES do you like more?
Even if you're "spiritually inclined," how can you think that there was any crumb on the table these guys set that was not poison?
If it was Tuesday and either one of them said it was Tuesday, I'd still check a calendar.